|
In 2004, Black & Veatch completed two economic impact analysis
studies of renewable and advanced energy in Pennsylvania spurred by
two pieces of legislation in the past two years. This first was a renewable
portfolio standard (RPS) mandating that 10 percent of retail electric
energy by 2015 come from renewable sources. The second was the recently
enacted Advanced Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS), which requires that
18 percent of retail electric energy by 2020 come from two tiers of
renewable and advanced technologies. The studies included a review of
the current status of renewable energy development in the United States
and Pennsylvania, characterization of renewable power generation technologies,
assessment of Pennsylvania’s renewable resources and estimation
of economic benefits the state would experience by adopting each policy.
The study was performed for the Community Foundation for the Alleghenies,
which was funded by the Heinz Endowments.
RPS policies have been a popular mechanism used by other states and
countries to mandate a certain percentage of electricity be generated
from renewable energy resources. To date, 18 states have implemented
RPS policies, and many others are actively considering the adoption
of an RPS. These policies have directly initiated the installation of
thousand of megawatts of renewable energy and have helped to spur the
20 to 30 percent growth in wind energy capacity in the United States
over the past 5 years. The AEPS enacted in Pennsylvania is unique among
all other states by its inclusion of energy conservation and advanced
fossil fuel conversion technologies, such as waste coal combustion and
integrated gasification combined cycle.
RPS Assessment – March 2004
The RPS was compared against a “Business-as-Usual” case
of building conventional fossil fuel technologies rather than the renewable
energy developed under the RPS. The analysis revealed that the RPS would
cost $1.23 billion more than the BAU case on a present value basis,
equating to an increase of $0.29 cents per month for the average residential
customer. However, the RPS would result in $10.1 billion more in gross
state output and $2.8 billion more in earnings over the 20 year time
period than the BAU portfolio. Additionally, for this minimal increase
in monthly electric bills, 85,000 more job-years than the BAU portfolio
would be generated by developing clean renewable energy resources. A
comprehensive report was prepared summarizing the findings of the study.
The report is organized is into the following chapters:
A. Executive Summary
B. Current Status of Renewable Energy
C. Renewable Technologies Assessment
D. Renewable Resource Assessment
E. Economic Impact Assessment
To download a PDF version of the full study report, please click the
following link: Economic
Impact of Renewable Energy in Pennsylvania Report
To download a PDF version of the study results presented at the Pennsylvania
Sustainable Energy Board Annual Meeting, please click the following
link: Economic Impact
of Renewable Energy in Pennsylvania Presentation
AEPS Assessment – November 2004
The AEPS assessment was performed to analyze the economic impacts of
a new and dramatically different version of the RPS moving through the
state legislature. The version of the AEPS analyzed for the study is
slightly more aggressive than the version eventually passed (20 percent
of energy by 2014 versus 18 percent of energy by 2020). In addition,
the models used for the first analysis were updated and improved for
this study to produce a more thorough analysis of the make-up of the
AEPS portfolio, implementation costs, and economic impacts. The analysis
of the AEPS revealed that it would cost about $1.8 billion less than
the BAU case over 20 years, which equates to potential electric bill
savings of about one percent. In addition to potential electric bill
savings, the AEPS was also estimated to increase gross state output
by over $9.0 billion, increase earnings by about $2.7 billion, and create
over 70,000 job-years over 20 years relative to the BAU case. The AEPS
assessment was performed as an update of the previous RPS study and
is presented as a Chapter F.
To download a PDF version of the analysis of the AEPS, please click
the following link: AEPS Analysis
To download a PDF version of the AEPS study results presented to the
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, please click the following link: AEPS Study Results
For more information, contact
us.
|